Article by Foreign Minister Westerwelle and other Foreign Ministers on the Ukraine. Published in the International Herald Tribune.

05.03.2012 - Interview

Article by Carl Bildt, William Hague, Karel Schwarzenberg, Radoslaw Sikorski and Guido Westerwelle. Published in the International Herald Tribune on 5 March 2012


This day five years ago, the EU and Ukraine launched negotiations on a ground-breaking new agreement with the aim of fostering Ukraine’s political association and economic integration with the EU. By now, we should have been able to celebrate a signed and ratified agreement, and a successful Ukraine making progress towards even closer co-operation with the EU. Instead, we pass a new milestone on what is becoming a much too long and painful road.
In March 2007, hopes were high for a sustainable democratic development of Ukraine. Indeed, the country has been regarded as a beacon of democracy in the former Soviet Union and has a better track record of free and fair elections than most other countries in the region. This has allowed the EU to go for much closer relations with Ukraine and also helped pave the way for the Eastern Partnership - an ambitious policy aiming at political association and economic integration between the EU and its six Eastern European partners.
Today, however, we are at an impasse in the association process: while negotiations on the Association Agreement have been successfully concluded in December 2011, the way forward, through signing and ratification of the agreement, has in effect been blocked by Ukraine’s actions. The reason for this is simple: developments in Ukraine in the last two years have caused us to question Kyiv’s intentions with respect to the fundamental values that underpin both the agreement and our relations in a broader sense.
Following Viktor Yanukovych’s victory in 2010 in the Presidential election, which is widely recognised as meeting international standards, Ukraine adopted an ambitious reform agenda, aiming mainly at boosting economic growth, alleviating the effects of the financial crisis and setting the country on a course towards deeper and closer ties with the EU. From our side, we could only support such a strong commitment to reforms, and we strongly welcomed Ukraine’s European choice.
We cannot, however, conceal our growing concerns regarding the state of democracy in Ukraine (authorities). Independent media and civil society organizations report pressure from the authorities. In late 2010, criminal proceedings were launched against a number of leading opposition politicians. And a year later, former PM Yulia Tymoshenko was sentenced to seven years in prison and approximately 140 million euro in damages for allegedly abusing her office, following a trial that has been widely criticized both in Ukraine and abroad as not meeting international standards. Moreover, more than a dozen other opposition politicians are facing similar charges. On 27 February, the former Minister of the Interior, Yuriy Lutsenko, was sentenced to four years in prison after another disappointing trial.
These trials bear the marks of politically-motivated and selective justice. According to independent experts, they have been conducted in a manner that has failed to respect the principles of the rule of law and the human rights of the defendants.
These developments are incompatible with Ukraine’s own European choice. Democracy, human rights and the rule of law are the values underpinning the Association Agreement and Ukraine has already committed itself to them in the framework of the OSCE, the Council of Europe, and also vis-à-vis the EU. Thus, it is fair to say that the Association Agreement has been imprisoned, and the Ukrainian leadership is holding the key.
In October 2012, Ukrainian voters will elect a new parliament. This will be a litmus test for democracy. On that day, the eyes of the international community will be on Ukraine, with the hope and expectation that the country will not renege on its tradition of free and fair elections. The notion of “free and fair elections” evidently entails that the opposition is allowed to participate fully. We wish to underline that, ultimately, it is the responsibility of the Government to ensure that all political parties, including the opposition and its leaders, are able to participate on equal terms. We call on Ukraine to send an early invitation to ODIHR observers, to pave the way for a substantial international observation mission.
We see ourselves as Ukraine’s allies. We believe in the people of Ukraine and in Ukraine’s democratic and economic potential. We know that the road of reforms, which Ukraine has chosen to take, is long and challenging. But we are convinced that closer political and economic ties, as well as people-to-people contacts, between the EU and Ukraine offer huge benefits for both partners. Twenty years of independence and sovereignty have brought an irreversible change in the mentality of the Ukrainian society. The people of Ukraine are Europeans and share European values. Our goal is to anchor Ukraine in the European family, as symbolised through the signing and ratification of the Association Agreement. Today, we call on the Ukrainian leadership to display the political courage and wisdom needed for this to happen.

Carl Bildt, William Hague, Karel Schwarzenberg, Radoslaw Sikorski and Guido Westerwelle are foreign ministers of Sweden, Britain, the Czech Republic, Poland and Germany.

Related content


Top of page